Legal Opinion

Great Northern Telegraph Co. v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1947PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThacher, J.

The Appellate Division has affirmed, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion, an order which denied a motion by the plaintiff to join The Chartered Bank of India, Australia and China as an additional party defendant in the action against whom plaintiff’s right to relief is alleged to exist in the alternative and in allowing this appeal has certified the following questions:

“ 1. Had the Supreme Court the power to grant plaintiff’s motion to join The Chartered Bank of India, Australia and China as an additional party herein against whom plaintiff seeks relief in the alternative?

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Akely v. . KinnicuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Ader v. BlauNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Carr v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1947

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Public Administrator v. Royal Bank of CanadaNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. City of Buffalo v. Hanna Furnace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Opal v. Material Service Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  4. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New York v. BattatNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Adams v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API