Legal Opinion
Public Administrator v. Royal Bank of Canada
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 16, 1967PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge Fuld.
The underlying issue presented by this appeal is whether service of process on the New York branch of a foreign (Canadian) bank sufficed to give our courts jurisdiction over an incorporated branch of the same bank located in France. However, before we reach that issue, we must pass upon the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the proceedings in our court on the ground that the question certified to us by the Appellate Division is not decisive of the appeal.
We deem the case to be properly before us. (See N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 3, subd. b, par. [4]; CPLE 5602, subd. [b], par. 1.)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Great Northern Telegraph Co. v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
3Cited by62 opinions
- Braschi v. Stahl Associates Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Bulova Watch Co., Inc. v. K. Hattori & Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- ABKCO Industries, Inc. v. LennonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Top Form Mills, Inc. v. Sociedad Nationale Industria Applicazioni ViscosaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.