Legal Opinion

Opal v. Material Service Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 30, 1956No. Gen. 46,751PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PBESIDINC JUSTICE FBIEND

delivered the opinion of the court.

This cause, No. 46751, hereinafter referred to as the Opal case, and cause No. 46750, referred to as the Dorsey case, present common questions and issues of law and were heard concurrently in the Circuit Court on similar motions to strike the second amended complaint. Pending the appeals, we here entered an order, on motion of defendant in the Opal case, consolidating the two causes for hearing and argument. The Circuit Court sustained defendants’ motions to dismiss the second amended complaints in both proceedings on the grounds of…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Booth v. . R., W. O.T.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Fitz Simons & Connell Co. v. Braun & FittsIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Akely v. . KinnicuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1924

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hulke v. International Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  2. Riordan v. International Armament Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Whitney v. Ralph Myers Contracting CorporationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Clark v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Fallon v. INDIAN TRAIL SCHOOL, ADDISON TP. SCH. DIST.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API