Lowe v. Ozmun
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. D. K. Trask, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
Action for conversion. Judgment for plaintiff, from which judgment and an order denying a new trial defendant appeals.
The complaint, which appears to have been filed May 9, 1900, alleges that in 1896 plaintiff was the owner of certain bonds of the Pasadena Consolidated Gas Company of the value of $20,000, and bonds of the Pasadena and Mt. Wilson Railway Company of the value of $10,000; that at that date he pledged the same with A. M. Ozmun to secure an indebtedness of $10,801.66. That said Ozmun, on the tenth day of May, 1897, unlawfully converted said bonds to his own use, at which date…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chapman v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Dodge v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Lowe v. OzmunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Williams v. HahnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by22 opinions
- Gins v. Mauser Plumbing Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Gruber v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Kee v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Bertone v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Kessinger v. Organic Fertilizers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.