Legal Opinion

Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Bancroft

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 20, 1922No. 6 Div. 641PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardener, J.

[1] This is a suit upon a life insurance policy upon which the insured had obtained a loan of $350, and pledged the policy as security therefor. The pledge of the policy was in the form of a loan agreement, called the “certificate of indebtedness,” signed by the insured and also the beneficiary. 'This agreement effected an assignment and transfer of the insurance policy to the company, to which the policy was delivered. This loan was made something like 2% years before the policy was paid up, but the subsequent premiums were promptly paid and the policy became paid up in November, 1915. No…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. N. L. Curry & Bro.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  2. Hagan v. Continental National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  3. Palmer v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Stevens v. . Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Ruane v. Manhattan Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Highland v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Jenkins v. RaulstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. BrandtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. Morrow v. Commonwealth Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. Hammond v. Volunteer State Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API