Legal Opinion

State v. Disorbo

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 23, 1981No. 42895, CA 19022PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant appeals his jury convictions of rape and sodomy in the first degree, contending that (1) he was denied due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment because he was unable to present the testimony of an eyewitness who, the state acknowledges, would have given exculpatory testimony, and (2) the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We affirm.

The victim met defendant and "Jim Phillips” in a Eugene tavern. The three drank several glasses of beer together and played some pool. The victim agreed to accompany the men to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. Newbern v. Exley Produce ExpressOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State v. VarneyOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. TothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. State v. BolgerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. State v. DikeosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. State v. SullensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API