Legal Opinion
People v. Dickson
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 15, 1983No. Crim 42521PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Luther Dickson appeals from the judgment entered upon his plea of guilty to manufacturing methaqualone for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379). He contends that certain physical evidence should have been suppressed on grounds it was unlawfully discovered and seized at a Los Angeles residence. We find merit in this claim of unlawful search and seizure though for different reasons than asserted in appellant’s brief.
I. Statement of Facts and Proceedings Below
Evidence relating to the search and seizure was taken both at the preliminary hearing and a hearing on a 1538.5 motion.…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Tamborino v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. BlackwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- People v. MessinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.