Legal Opinion
People v. Blackwell
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 1983No. Crim, 43179PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
Defendants Nigel Blackwell and Andres Robles appeal from the judgments entered upon their pleas of guilty to possessing piperidine and cyclohexanone with the intent to manufacture phencyclidine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11383, subd. (b)(1)). Defendants contend their suppression motion (Pen. Code, § 1538.5) should have been granted on grounds the evidence was unlawfully seized from Blackwell’s residence. We agree that the warrantless reentry was not justified by exigent circumstances and accordingly will reverse the judgment.
The evidence at the suppression hearing, viewed in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. RameyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. LeybaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. MessinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. StegmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. AbesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. BoragnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.