Legal Opinion

People v. Duncan

California Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1986No. Crim. 24414PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

Does the odor of ether and other evidence that an unlawful drug laboratory is in operation constitute exigent circumstances sufficient to justify the warrantless entry and search of a dwelling. As will appear, we conclude that such a determination must be made on a case-by-case basis and that in the case at bar the entry and search were justified.

On April 7, 1981, at approximately 12:30 p.m., Officer Steven Paulson responded to a radio call that a burglary was in progress or had just occurred. He arrived promptly at the scene and spoke to a neighbor; testimony conflicted as to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Fare v. Tony C.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. RameyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. People v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. PanahCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. CoddingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. People v. RayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API