Legal Opinion
State v. Craig
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 25, 1969No. 412PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYounger, J.
The defendant in this case was found guilty in the Fostoria Municipal Court of riding a motorcycle without a protective helmet in violation of Section 4511.53, Revised Code, and has appealed on the ground that such statute deprives him of his constitutional rights guaranteed by the state of Ohio and the United States.
Section 4511.53, Revised Code (as amended and effective January 1, 1968, 132 Ohio Laws H 380), reads, in pertinent parts, as follows:
<<• • •
“No person shall operate a motorcycle on a highway * * * unless wearing a protective helmet on his head # * *. Such helmet * * * shall…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Minnesota v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Fairmont Creamery Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- American Motorcycle Ass'n v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arutanoff v. Metropolitan GovernmentTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. AlsoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Bogue v. FairclothDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1970
- State v. BettsFranklin County Municipal Court · 1969
- State v. StoufferOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.