Smith v. Gibbons
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEsvik, J.
Tbe complaint states three causes of action, and tbe question arises, Are they improperly united? Gr.S. 1-127 (5).
Tbe first cause of action arises on a contract, and tbe second and third causes of action arise in tort. Hence, they could not have been united in tbe same complaint at common law. McIntosh: North Carolina'Practice and Procedure in Civil Cases, section 420. Besides, it is apparent that tbe joinder of tbe first cause of action with the second and third causes of action is not even sanctioned by tbe Code of Civil Procedure unless they fall within tbe purview of tbe section providing…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Daniels v. . FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Benton v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Hancammon v. . CarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Railroad Co. v. Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Pressley v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Garrett v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Mills v. CAROLINA CEMETERY PARK CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- McKinley v. HinnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Tart v. ByrneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Commercial Finance Co. v. HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.