Legal Opinion

Jones v. Horace Mann Insurance Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1997No. 4821PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal arises from the superior court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Horace Mann Insurance Company. The superior court held that a homeowner’s policy issued by Horace Mann did not cover a snowmachine accident, which occurred on a public road.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On November 24, 1991, Frank Jones, Jr. was struck by a snowmachine operated by ten-year-old Christopher Chezik and sustained serious injuries to his right leg. Chezik had been giving rides to friends on the machine that day. The accident occurred on Ridgeway Road, a public…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States Fire Insurance v. SchnackenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. SandbulteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. Herzog v. National American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ellingstad v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Huizar v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. C.P. Ex Rel. M.L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Fejes v. Alaska Ins. Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hanson v. North Star Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API