Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Judge.
Nabisco Brands, Inc. (Employer) appeals from the April 28, 2000 order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB), which (1) affirmed the decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) to grant the claim petition filed by John Tro-pello (Claimant) based on a 21% binaural hearing impairment and (2) increased the award of benefits from 52 to 54.6 weeks. We affirm as modified.
Claimant began working for Employer in 1970 as a floor helper and became a mixer in 1980. As a mixer, Claimant is a chocolate operator, which entails taking weights of the chocolate in the. machines…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kraus v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Cruz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Mearion v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- American Chain & Cable Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Purex Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Capasso v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Wheeler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Dow v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Morrell v. ZONING HEARING BD. OF SHREWSBURYCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- YDC New Castle-PA DPW v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.