Legal Opinion
Capasso v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 17, 2004PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
Anthony Capasso (Claimant) appeals from an order denying Claimant’s Petition seeking reinstatement of his suspended benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act). 1 We agree Claimant is ineligible for benefits under a reinstatement after retirement analysis. Thus, we affirm.
Claimant was employed with RACS Associates, Inc. (Employer) as a working foreman, in which position he was required to perform ninety percent of his work over his head. Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) Finding of Fact (F.F.) No,. 5. Claimant was injured at work in 1991, and a Notice of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- McKay v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Williams v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Taliaferro v. Darby Tp. Zoning Hearing Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- County of Allegheny v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Dougherty v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board: (QVC, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Hellam Township v. Hellam Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.