Legal Opinion

State v. James Sanford Agency

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

This action was prosecuted below under Code, section 9316, to enjoin the James Sanford Agency, a Tennessee corporation, from engaging in the practice of law; and also as a quo warranto proceeding to terminate its corporate existence because its method of transacting the business of a collection agency amounted to an unlawful practice of law.

A temporary injunction was issued by the chancellor which, in general terms, restrained the defendant from engaging in the practice of law. This injunction was made perpetual by final decree, from which the defendant appeals. The chancellor’s decree…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. v. Retail Credit Men's Ass'nTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Berk v. State Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Ingersoll v. Coal Creek Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Cohn v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Weeks v. SibleyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Norvell v. Credit Bureau of Albuquerque, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. C. S. Dudley & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. J. H. Marshall & Associates, Inc. v. BurlesonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. State Ex Rel. Frieson v. IsnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. In re Shoe Manufacturers Protective Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API