Legal Opinion

Berk v. State Ex Rel. Thompson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 26, 1932No. 6 Div. 116PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The petition is in the nature of a quo warranto directed against one alleged to have and who is proposing to continue practicing law without the license required to lawfully engage in that profession.

The appeal is from a judgment rendered wherein the defendant was adjudged guilty of practicing law without a license, as required by law, and was prohibited from continuing the practice of law until he becomes regularly licensed to practice as required by law.

The petition was filed in the name of the state of Alabama on the relation, of R. Dupont Thompson and by R. Dupont Thompson, questioning…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Illinois State Bar Ass'n v. Peoples Stock Yards State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Matter of Co-Operative Law Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. People v. . AlfaniNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. In Re DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  5. Eley v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. GoodmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Boynton v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Lawrence v. GayleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  4. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. C. S. Dudley & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. In re Shoe Manufacturers Protective Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API