Legal Opinion

Ex parte Page

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1872PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Petition for Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, Judge

It appears from the record submitted to this court that the petitioner was indicted in the Osage Circuit Court for the crime, of grand larceny, that he confessed his guilt, and that the court *292sentenced him to ten years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. He has already served out four years of the time for which he was sentenced, and he now asks to be discharged on the ground that his sentence was illegal.

The statute provides that persons convicted of grand larceny shall be punished as follows: “First, stealing a horse, mare, gelding, colt, filly, mule, or ass, by imprisonment in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re ToneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
  2. In re TrumanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lamb v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Ex parte MooneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Cross v. GouldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Curtis v. TozerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Ex-parte BowenSupreme Court of Florida · 1889

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API