Ex-parte Bowen
Supreme Court of Florida
This is a ease of original jurisdiction. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the' court.
1Opinion of the Court
Raney, C. J.:
It is not the function of a writ of habeas corpus to bring in review any irregularly or mere error of procedure committed by the judicial tribunal having jurisdiction of the cause and the person and under whose final judgment the party claiming to be unlawfully restrained of his liberty may be held. Such irregularities do not affect the jurisdiction of the Court, or render the judgment void ; they make it voidable upon an appeal or writ of error or similar direct proceeding, but can not be considered in a collateral proceeding. If the judgment is void, either because of want of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Tweed v. . LiscombNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Ex parte GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Kirby v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Ex parte PageSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- In re Crandall for a Habeas CorpusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Ex parte SeniorSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
- Ex parte KnightSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
- Jenkins v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Hardee v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.