Legal Opinion
Oakland County Treasurer v. Auditor General
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 29, 1940No. Calendar 40,959PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
This is an application for mandamus brought by plaintiff, treasurer of Oakland county, based upon the State land office board act (Act No. 155, § § 5, 7, Pub. Acts 1937, as amended by Act No. 244, Pub. Acts 1939 [Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, §§ 3723-5, 3723-7]), against defendants to require the auditor general to accept a sum of money tendered for the purpose of redeeming a parcel of land from the May, 1938, tax sale; to compel the State land office board to withhold the property forever from the scavenger sale provided for in section 7 of the act; and to command the State of Michigan, and all of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Youngblood v. SextonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- City of Detroit v. Township of RedfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Meister v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- State ex rel. Utick v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Attorney General v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- James A. Welch Co. v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Municipal Investors Ass'n v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Langford v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Holmes v. Haughton Elevator Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Attorney General Ex Rel. McKenzie v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.