Legal Opinion

United States v. Ventimiglia

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 28, 1956No. Cr. No. 23345PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.

The defendants were indicted on a four-count indictment for violation of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. § 141 et seq., specifically, 29 U.S.C.A. § 186(a); and also under 18 U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States). Count I was for conspiracy to violate section 186(a)1. The overt acts alleged were the payment by the defendants Par-ran and Weather-Mastic, Inc., through the defendant Ventimiglia, of sums of money to one Joseph Martin, “the representative of Weather-Mastic, Inc.’s employees”, on August 13,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. People v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Woo Wai v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. RosnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  2. Frank Paul Ventimiglia, James Harold Parran, and Weather-Mastic, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
  3. United States v. LaveryDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API