United States v. Ventimiglia
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.
The defendants were indicted on a four-count indictment for violation of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. § 141 et seq., specifically, 29 U.S.C.A. § 186(a); and also under 18 U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States). Count I was for conspiracy to violate section 186(a)1. The overt acts alleged were the payment by the defendants Par-ran and Weather-Mastic, Inc., through the defendant Ventimiglia, of sums of money to one Joseph Martin, “the representative of Weather-Mastic, Inc.’s employees”, on August 13,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- People v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Woo Wai v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. RosnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Frank Paul Ventimiglia, James Harold Parran, and Weather-Mastic, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. LaveryDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962