United States v. Rosner
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAUMAN, District Judge.
Defendant Edmund Rosner has moved to dismiss the indictment pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and to suppress evidence of certain conversations between himself and a Government agent. For the reasons that follow, the motion to dismiss is granted as to Count 3 and as to all reference to 18 U.S.C. § 2071 in Count 1. The motion is denied in all other respects. The motion to suppress is also denied.
The indictment, which is something less than a masterpiece of draftsmanship, charges the defendants in eight counts. They are accused of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. John Digilio, in No. 75-2218. Appeal of Harry Lupo, in No. 75-2219. Appeal of Peter Szwandrak, in No. 75-2220Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- State v. OrtizArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- United States v. Paul WalasekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Herbert A. Howard and Elmer Gary RitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. KumarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.