United States v. Thomas
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFerguson, Judge
(concurring in part and dissenting in part) :
Professor Jerome Hall traces the difficulty in analyzing the defense of impossibility in criminal attempts to Baron Bramwell’s original use of illustrative fact situations “from Never-Never Land” in Regina v Collins, 9 Cox CC 497, 169 Eng Rep 1477 (1864). Hall, General Principles of Criminal Law, 2d ed, page 693. am inclined to attribute it to a growing tendency on the part of legal theoreticians to attach more importance to the evilness of a man’s intent than to his acts — a belief, if you will, that the law should punish sinful thoughts if…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- State v. WeleckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- People v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- People v. . JaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Brooks v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.