Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Thomas

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 7, 1962No. 15,741Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFerguson, Judge

(concurring in part and dissenting in part) :

Professor Jerome Hall traces the difficulty in analyzing the defense of impossibility in criminal attempts to Baron Bramwell’s original use of illustrative fact situations “from Never-Never Land” in Regina v Collins, 9 Cox CC 497, 169 Eng Rep 1477 (1864). Hall, General Principles of Criminal Law, 2d ed, page 693. am inclined to attribute it to a growing tendency on the part of legal theoreticians to attach more importance to the evilness of a man’s intent than to his acts — a belief, if you will, that the law should punish sinful thoughts if…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  2. State v. WeleckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. People v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. People v. . JaffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Brooks v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API