Russell Johnson, Iii v. Lucent Technologies Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us to decide whether 42 U.S.C. § 1981 retaliation claims are governed by the four-year statute of limitations applicable to claims “arising under an Act of Congress enacted” after December 1, 1990, 28 U.S.C. § 1658, or by the personal injury statute of limitations of the forum state. Section 1981 retaliation claims were foreclosed by Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164, 109 S.Ct. 2363, 105 L.Ed.2d 132 (1989), and then made again possible by the Civil Rights Act of 1991. Because they arise under a post-December 1, 1990 Act of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by180 opinions
- P. Victor Gonzalez v. Planned Parenthood of LaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- James Mills v. City of CovinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Oklevueha Native American Church of Hawaii, Inc. v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Morgan v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
- Anderson v. Jamba Juice Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
175 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.