McClintock v. McClintock
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Gibbons, J.:
In this appeal, we consider whether the district court may use a nunc pro tunc order to modify the date of a divorce decree. Because a nunc pro tunc order can only reflect that which was actually done, we conclude that the district court cannot use a nunc pro tunc order to change the date of a divorce decree to a date before the date when the matter was adjudicated. Since, in this case, the district court’s order changed the date of a divorce decree to a date before the district court adjudicated the matter, we reverse the order and remand for proceedings…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Day v. DayNevada Supreme Court · 1964
- Finley v. FinleyNevada Supreme Court · 1948
- Williams v. WilliamsNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Koester v. Administrator of the Estate of KoesterNevada Supreme Court · 1985
- Thrash v. ThrashMississippi Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by2 opinions
- MacK v. Estate of MacKNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Seaton v. SeatonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011