Legal Opinion
Antheunisse v. Tiffany & Co., Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 22, 1988PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
229 N.J. Super. 399 (1988)
551 A.2d 1006
SUSAN ANTHEUNISSE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
TIFFANY & COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 5, 1988.
Decided December 22, 1988.
Before Judges PETRELLA and GRUCCIO.
Gail S. Boertzel argued the cause for appellant (Stephen S. Weinstein, attorney).
Joseph E. Zavesky argued the cause for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: GRUCCIO, J.A.D.
Plaintiff Susan Antheunisse appeals from a judgment dismissing her complaint for personal injuries allegedly sustained while working for defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Whitehead v. Safway Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Renfroe v. Higgins Rack Coating & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Chickachop v. Manpower, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Blessing v. T. Shriver and Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. BoylanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Roma v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Marino v. Industrial Crating Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Turner v. WongNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Sorenson v. Colibri Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.