Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Wasserburger

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 2001No. 35916PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Maupin, C. J.:

This appeal raises an issue of first impression for Nevada: on what date a cause of action arises, for statute of limitation purposes, when an obligation under a written agreement is repudiated before the date set for performance.

Appellant Renee Schwartz, suing in her capacity as personal representative of her late husband’s estate, claims that the respondents breached a purchase agreement entered into by her husband before his death. The district court dismissed Ms. Schwartz’s complaint, ultimately concluding that NRS 11.190(l)(b), the six-year statute of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Morris Kinsey D/B/A Kinsey Farms, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Bemis v. Estate of BemisNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Taylor v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Heritage, Inc. v. Nevada Gold & Casino, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  2. Pierce v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Takiguchi v. MRI International, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2014
  4. Morrison v. Quest Diagnostics Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2015
  5. Patricia Morrison v. Quest Diagnostics Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API