Legal Opinion

City of North Charleston v. Harper

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 28, 1991No. 23503PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

The question is whether the circuit judge erred in striking a city ordinance that imposed a mandatory thirty day sentence on any person found to be knowingly in possession of less than twenty-eight grams of marijuana or ten grams of hashish on the grounds that the ordinance was unconstitutional and that it conflicted with state law. We affirm.

I. FACTS

Clarence B. Harper (Harper) was arrested for simple possession of marijuana in contravention of North Charleston City Code § 13-3. City Code § 13-3 provides for a mandatory thirty day sentence for those found guilty under the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arnold v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  2. Town of Hilton Head Island v. Fine Liquors, Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. SolomonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  4. McAbee v. Southern Rwy. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  5. City of Charleston v. JenkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hospitality Ass'n of South Carolina, Inc. v. County of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Martin v. CondonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Connor v. Town of Hilton Head IslandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Foothills Brewing Concern, Inc. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Beachfront Entertainment, Inc. v. Town of Sullivan's IslandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API