Legal Opinion

Martin v. Condon

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 9, 1996No. 24518PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice:

This appeal is from an order finding the local option provisions of the Video Game Machines Act constitutional. We reverse.

*185 FACTS

Appellant commenced this declaratory judgment action challenging the constitutionality of S.C.Code Ann. §§ 12-21-2806 and -2808 (Supp.1995) of the Video Game Machines Act. Section 12-21-2806 provides for a referendum vote held on a county-by-county basis to determine the legality of non-machine cash payouts from coin-operated video game machines. As a result of the county referenda, these payouts became illegal in twelve of the forty-six counties in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Knight v. SalisburySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. HammondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  4. Westvaco Corp. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. ELLIOTT v. SlighSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Collins Entertainment Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  2. State v. 192 Coin-Operated Video Game MacHinesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Mims Amusement Co. v. South Carolina Law Enforcement DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. White v. JM Brown Amusement Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Lee v. South Carolina Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API