Legal Opinion

State v. Solomon

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 12, 1965No. 18330PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Justice.

The defendant, Aaron Soloman, has appealed from a conviction of operating his business, known as the Sam Solomon Company, on Sunday in violation of Act No. 850 of the 1962 Acts of the General Assembly, 52 Stat. 2134. The issues to be decided concern the sufficiency of the indictment under which the defendant was convicted, the constitutionality of the foregoing statute, the validity of a city ordinance which the defendant claimed made the operation of his business on Sunday lawful, and alleged error in the charge to the jury. The defendant does not question the sufficiency of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. Gamble Skogmo, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. Spartan's Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. CrenshawSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. Town of Hilton Head Island v. Coalition of Expressway OpponentsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API