Legal Opinion
GREAT WALL
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1977No. ID 2566PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #2566 MATTER OF GREAT WALL In Visa Petition Proceedings A-19784032 Decided by Acting Regional Commissioner March 16, 1977 (1) Petitioner sought to classify beneficiary for the issuance of an immigrant visa under section 203(a)(6) of the Immigration and Nationality Act as a store manager at a salary of 5850.00 per month. The record reveals that at the time the petition was filed the petitioner did not and could not pay the proffered wage indicated in the job offer (Form MA 7-50B) nor did the petitioner establish on appeal that he could and would be able to pay the beneficiary…
2Cases cited3 opinions
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tongatapu Woodcraft Hawaii, Ltd. v. Sam I. Feldman, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Elatos Restaurant Corp. v. SavaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- KCP Food Co., Inc. v. SavaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Masonry Masters, Inc., Successor to Tenco Masonry, Inc., Rigoberto Perdomo v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the U.S.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Patel v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.