Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1910PublishedCited by 10 opinions

FROM PICKETT. Appeal in error from the Criminal Court of Pickett County. — J. M. Gardenitire, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Shields

The indictment in this case contains two counts.

The first charges that the plaintiff in error “did unlawfully obstruct the navigation of the main channel *297of a navigable stream, viz., Wolf river, at a place generally known as ‘Miller’s Mill,’ in tbe Ponrtb civil district of Pickett county, by erecting a dam in and across tbe same.”

Tbe second count charges that tbe plaintiff in error “did unlawfully obstruct Wolf river, a navigable stream, at a place in tbe Fourth civil district of Pickett county known as ‘Miller’s Mill,’ tbe same being being a public highway for tbe transportation of large…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morgan v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Griffith v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Gaston v. MaceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Webster v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Commissioners of Burke County v. Catawba Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ryals v. PigottMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Burr's Ferry, B. & C. Ry. Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. United States of America Upon the Relation and for the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Richard L. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States ex rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HughesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967
  5. American Red Cross v. HinsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API