Legal Opinion

Commissioners of Burke County v. Catawba Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1895PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Petition to rebear case decided at September Term, 1894, and reported in 115 N. C., 590.

1Opinion of the Court

It seems to be settled law in North Carolina, as in all of the states, that navigable streams of every class, however defined or distinguished from other water courses, are natural highways, and that the public easement, whatever may be its extent, is paramount to the private right of the riparian proprietor. S. v. Narrows Island Club, 100 N.C. 477; S. v.Glen, 52 N.C. 321, 327; Broadnax v. Baker, 94 N.C. 675; Gould on Waters (2 Ed.), secs. 86, 87, 107, 108 and 110; Angell Water Courses, 541a; 16 Am. Eng. Enc., p. 236; Sullivan v. Jernigan, 21 Fla. 264. All waters including bays, inlets,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. The MontelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Deans v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Bond v. . WoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. State v. . GlenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859
  5. Thunder Bay River Booming Co. v. SpeechlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Farmers Co-Operative Manufacturing Co. v. Albemarle & Raleigh RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. People ex rel. Deneen v. Economy Light & Power Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. Baum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. In Re Howser's PetitionDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API