Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Opera Ass'n v. Pilot Radio Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1947PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
Metropolitan Opera Association, Inc., has brought an action to restrain the defendants from using the name “ Metropolitan Symphony Orchestra ” or the name “ Metropolitan ” or any name or title calculated to have the tendency to cause the orchestra used by the defendants to be confused with plaintiff’s orchestra. This motion is for a preliminary injunction asking for the same relief in advance of trial. Defendants are Pilot Radio Corporation and Isidore Goldberg.
In October, 1946, one Abramson, representing the defendants, stated to Keppel, the comptroller and acting secretary of plaintiff,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932
- Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Tiffany Company v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Philadelphia Storage Battery Co. v. MindlinNew York Supreme Court · 1937
- Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1927
3Cited by4 opinions
- THOMSON MACHINERY COMPANY v. LaRoseDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
- Metropolitan Opera Ass'n v. Metropolitan Artists, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Scher & Feldman, Inc. v. Jubilee Juniors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- Allied Maintenance Corp. v. Allied Mechanical Trades, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977