Legal Opinion
Philadelphia Storage Battery Co. v. Mindlin
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 10, 1937PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
Plaintiff, a manufacturer of radio sets, storage batteries and associated products, seeks an injunction pendente lite restraining defendant from using its nationally celebrated brand “ Philco ” in connection with the sale of razor blades. Plaintiff has never manufactured or sold razor blades, and so far as appears from the papers, has no present intention of entering that field of endeavor. Defendant offers no explanation for its adoption of a mark which has been so widely and successfully exploited in other fields by plaintiff. The motion thus presents for determination the interesting…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vogue Co. v. Thompson-Hudson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932
- Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Tiffany Company v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Maison Prunier v. Prunier's Restaurant & Cafe, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- The Fleischmann Distilling Corp., a Corporation, Etc. v. Maier Brewing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. And Toyota Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Avon Shoe Co., Inc., and Haymaker Shoe Corp. v. David Crystal, Inc., Haymaker Sports, Inc., B. Altman & Co., Best & Co., Inc., and John WanamakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Hanson v. Triangle Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. A. & P. Radio Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.