Legal Opinion
Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1932PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.
Plaintiff sues to restrain defendant from using the name “ Tiffany ” in defendant’s business. Plaintiff, a New York corporation organized in 1868, successor of a business founded in 1837, in which one or more members of the Tiffany family have been continuously connected from 1837 to the present time, has carried on a widely advertised business in a variety of merchandise, including, especially, diamonds, jewelry and silverware Plaintiff’s trade-marks “ Tiffany ” and “ Tiffany & Co.” have been used-on its merchandise for many years. They have been registered in the United States Patent Office…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Long's Hat Stores Corp. v. Long's Clothes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- John Forsythe Co. v. Forsythe Shoe Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Wetzlar v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
3Cited by82 opinions
- Saratoga Vichy Spring Co., Inc. v. Orin Lehman, Commissioner of Parks and Recreation of the the State of New York and Waters of Saratoga Springs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Dawn Donut Company, Inc. v. Hart's Food Stores, Inc. And Starhart Bakeries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Allied Maintenance Corp. v. Allied Mechanical Trades, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. And Toyota Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Metropolitan Opera Ass'n, Inc. v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1950
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.