Legal Opinion

Cedric J. Smith v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 23, 2017No. 16-4085PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVNER, Circuit Judge.

Cedric Smith brought suit against the federal government under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671, et seq., for injuries he sustained when he fell off a stool at the federal courthouse in Rock Island, Illinois. Smith relies on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur to impute negligence to the government. The district court concluded that Smith had not made a showing sufficient to trigger the res ipsa loquitur inference of negligence. R. 12. We find to the contrary and reverse.and remand for further proceedings.

I

As the case was decided on summary judgment, we take…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Metz v. Central Illinois Electric & Gas Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Heastie v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Calles v. Scripto-Tokai Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Gatlin v. RuderIllinois Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Irina Tesoriero v. Carnival CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Doe v. Kane Cnty.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Allied Insurance Co. v. The United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  4. Bell v. Cook CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Bradley v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API