State v. Sutton

Robert Sutton appeals an order revoking his operating privileges for one year because of his refusal to submit to a chemical test under sec. 343.305, Stats. 2 He argues that the revocation was invalid because the arresting officer mistakenly informed him that refusal to submit to a chemical test could result in a jail penalty, and because the arresting officer did not issue a citation prior to requesting that Sutton submit to a chemical test. We affirm the revocation because even if an error was made by the arresting officer regarding jail time, the officer substantially complied with the…