Legal Opinion

City of St. Paul v. Bielenberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1925No. 24,515PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

' Action to recover damages for the defendant’s breach of his contract to grade a street. There were findings for the plaintiff for $8,250. The defendant appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The court found that on August 7, 1906, the defendant entered into a written contract with the plaintiff city “to grade Livingston Avenue to the established grade from George Street to Winifred Street” in St. Paul, the work to be completed by August 1, 1909. The making of the contract is denied in the pleadings. The contract produced at the trial was executed by the plaintiff, but not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bell v. KirklandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Paine v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  3. Rich v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. City of Minneapolis v. Republic Creosoting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Viliski v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Biesterfeld v. Asbestos Corp. of AmericaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Industrial Commission v. Arizona Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Groves v. John Wunder Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Christenson v. Argonaut Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API