Berman v. Minneapolis Photo Engraving Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county for the surrender to defendant corporation for cancelation, of five shares of capital stock, evidenced hy certificates issued to defendant Hare, and to enjoin him from voting or selling the stock. From an order, Hale, J., discharging an order to show cause why an injunction should not be granted restraining defendant Hare from voting five shares of stock alleged to have been unlawfully issued to him, plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from an order refusing to issue an injunction pendente late.
It is well settled that the issuance of such an injunction rests so largely in the discretion of the trial court that this court will interfere only where a clear abuse of such discretion is shown.
Plaintiffs brought the action to secure the cancelation of five shares of the capital stock of defendant company issued to defendant Hare, and to enjoin defendant Hare from disposing o'f or voting this stock. The temporary injunction was sought for the purpose of preventing defendant Hare from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Home Fire Insurance v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Babcock v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Alexander v. SearcySupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Just v. Idaho Canal & Improvement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Minneapolis Electric Lamp Co. v. Federal Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924