Legal Opinion

Application of Bowden

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 30, 1950No. Patent Appeal 5716PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Judge.

This is an appeal from not only the original decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Primary Examiner in his rejection of all of the claims, 12-19 and 22, in appellants’ application for a patent on insecticidal coating compositions but also from the decision of the same tribunal continuing the disallowance of the claims following appellants’ petition for reconsideration. Claim 19 was rejected as not reading on the elected species of coating composition and, therefore, need not be considered on the merits.

The composition…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kirsch Mfg. Co. v. Gould Mersereau Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  2. H. C. White Co. v. Morton E. Converse & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  3. In re ParlantiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Application of McKennaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  2. Application of WorrestCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  3. Application of SchechterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  4. Application of John Bulina (Deceased) and Jack T. BrownCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  5. Application of FranzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API