Legal Opinion

McSwain v. Adams Grain & Provision Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 30, 1912No. 8358PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Before De¡Vore¡, J., Laurens, Action by H. L. and L. F. McSwain against Adams Grain and Provision Company. Defendant appeals. cite: As to service on agent: 61 S. C. 361; 172 U. S. 602; 85 Am. R. 933. What is a broker? 4 Ency. 961; 61 S. C. 361; 73 S. C. 530. Evidence of agency: 58 S. C. 201; 59 N. J. Eq. 8; 51 S. W. 1095. cite: Effect of attachment: 83 S. C. 544; 57 S. C. 77; 4 Cyc. 775; 19 S. C. 526; 53 S. C. 110; 54 S. C. 582. A broker is an agent: 19 S. C. 191; 28 Supt.

Read the full summary

Before De¡Vore¡, J., Laurens, Action by H. L. and L. F. McSwain against Adams Grain and Provision Company. Defendant appeals. cite: As to service on agent: 61 S. C. 361; 172 U. S. 602; 85 Am. R. 933. What is a broker? 4 Ency. 961; 61 S. C. 361; 73 S. C. 530. Evidence of agency: 58 S. C. 201; 59 N. J. Eq. 8; 51 S. W. 1095. cite: Effect of attachment: 83 S. C. 544; 57 S. C. 77; 4 Cyc. 775; 19 S. C. 526; 53 S. C. 110; 54 S. C. 582. A broker is an agent: 19 S. C. 191; 28 Supt. Ct. R. 528; 38 S. C. 173; 129 U. S. 193; 198 U. S. 424; 28 Sup. Ct. R. 515. Carrying on business in this State: Code…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

The plaintiffs, who are residents of this State, brought this action against defendant, a foreign corporation, doing business in this State, to recover $353.38 damages alleged to have been sustained by them on account of the unsoundness of a carload of corn sold to them by defendant through E. C. Chapman, a broker, residing at Cross Hill, S. C. The corn was to be and was delivered to plaintiffs at Lota, S. C. They paid for it, and began to unload the car, when, as they allege, they discovered that only a small quantity of corn on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Pollock v. B. & L. Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  4. Jenkins v. Penn Bridge Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  5. Abbeville Electric Light & Power Co. v. Western Electrical Supply Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lipe v. C. C. & O. Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Ry. v. DeBowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  3. Bass v. American Products Export & I. Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  4. Szantay v. Beech Aircraft CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1965
  5. Thompson v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API