Legal Opinion
Szantay v. Beech Aircraft Corporation
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
Decided January 19, 1965No. Civ. A. AC-1105, AC-1107, AC-1108PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEMPHILL, Chief Judge.
Defendant Beech Aircraft Corporation, asserting that it is a Delaware Corporation with its principal place of business in Wichita, Kansas, that it is not domesticated in South Carolina, and that it had no agent and neither engaged or engages in business activities in the State, seeks to quash service of process upon it and dismiss the complaints for want of jurisdiction. Concomitant is the contention that Beech, because of the asserted facts, has not been properly served with process in any of these actions. Service was effectuated in two ways: by service through the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Marvine Markham v. City of Newport News, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Joseph M. Shealy, Jr. v. Challenger Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Szantay v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Superior Oil Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1978
- Scalise v. Beech Aircraft CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Hammond v. Honda Motor Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.