Legal Opinion
Parking Authority v. Nicovich
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 16, 1973No. Docket Nos. 13401, 13552PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVID, J.*
Defendants appeal from the judgment entered July 8, 1971,. awarding them $116,000 as compensation for their real property, condemned in fee for public parking purposes. Their complaint is that the award does not include “moving expenses,” damages by reason of relocation of their business, alleged loss in value to an assertedly unique auto parts inventory, loss of customers and business goodwill and costs of advertising in relation to the move.
Under the applicable law and the circumstances, defendants’ rights to compensation became fixed as of the date of trial. (Code Civ.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Karen deLAURIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and Lester G. Warrenbrock, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Beaty v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Melamed v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Superior Strut & Hanger Co. v. Port of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- McKeon v. Hastings College of the LawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.