Legal Opinion

United States v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles and Arrowhead Puritas Waters, Inc., and Aqua Media, Ltd., and A. M. Liquidating Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 18, 1978No. 77-2683, 77-2778PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge:

These are consolidated interlocutory appeals from a preliminary injunction and from an order denying appellants’ motion to dissolve the same injunction. The injunction arose in a suit by the United States against both the buyers and the sellers in a corporate acquisition which is alleged to violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18. The complaint sought divestiture or rescission of the acquisition as alternative remedies. To preserve the possibility of a decree of rescission at the conclusion of trial, the district court; on motion of the government,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Warner Communications Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. H. N. Singer, Inc., and Michael Quinlan and James Earl WeihoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Dennis BrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Federal Trade Commission, Cross-Appellee v. Southwest Sunsites, Inc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. Gerlinger v. Amazon. Com, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API