Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. H. N. Singer, Inc., and Michael Quinlan and James Earl Weihoff
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 26, 1982No. 80-4508, 81-4119PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
Defendants appeal from a preliminary injunction and from an order modifying it. We affirm.
I. The Nature of the Case.
In its complaint, filed in the district court, the Federal Trade Commission alleged violations of its trade regulation rule “Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Franchising and Business Opportunity Ventures,” 16 C.F.R. Part 436 (The Franchise Rule), and sought redress for third parties under Section 19 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 57b(a)(l) and (b). It also alleged false promises and false and misleading representations…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- The Republic of the Philippines v. Ferdinand E. MarcosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Charlesbank Equity Fund II v. Blinds to Go, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Federal Trade Commission v. Amy Travel Service, Inc., Resort Performance, Inc., Resort Telemarketing, Inc., Thomas P. McCann Ii, and James F. WeilandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.