Legal Opinion
Hafey v. Paul Havens Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided January 8, 1963No. 9692PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENRIOD, Chief Justice.
Appeal from a judgment in a case tried to the court, involving damage to a building being moved under contract between Hafey, owner, and Havens, house mover, the latter being insured for $5,000 by New Zealand *78against damage occasioned by an “overturning” of the equipment used. Affirmed. Costs to Hafey against Havens. Havens to have costs against New Zealand only as incurred against the latter.
The building was to be transported over a rather tortuous route in mountainous country. Cribbing at turns was necessary and apparently successfully accomplished. After negotiating…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Park v. Moorman Mfg. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
- Jack v. Standard Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Chemstrand Corp. v. Maryland Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Old Colony Insurance Company v. W. R. Anderson, D/B/A Duke Anderson Drilling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Orlando v. Manhattan Fire & Marine InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. NiesenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Mason v. Commercial Union Assurance CompaniesUtah Supreme Court · 1981