Legal Opinion
MacDonald v. Thomas M. Cooley Law School
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided July 20, 2012No. Case No. 1:11-CV-831PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION GRANTING COOLEY’S MOTION TO DISMISS
GORDON J. QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are 12 graduates of Defendant, Thomas M. Cooley Law School.1 They allege that Cooley deceived, defrauded, and misled them regarding Cooley graduates’ employment prospects, which caused Plaintiffs to pay more to attend law school than they would have paid if Plaintiffs had known the true prospects of their employment. The three-count amended complaint charges Cooley with violating Michigan’s Consumer Protection Act (MCPA), M.C.L. § 445.901, et seq. (Count I); fraud (Count II); and negligent misrepresentation…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Clayton Coffey v. Foamex L.P., and Recticel Foam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Titan Insurance Company v. HytenMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Thomas M. Cooley Law School v. Kurzon Strauss, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Llewellyn-Jones v. Metro Property Group, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- John MacDonald, Jr. v. Thomas M. Cooley Law SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Matanky v. Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.