Legal Opinion
Bannum, Inc. v. City of Fort Lauderdale
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 5, 1998No. 97-4901PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Chief Judge:
Appellants Bannum, Inc. and Bannum Properties, Inc. filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against appellee, the City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida (the City), alleging equal protection and due process violations in connection with the City’s enactment and enforcement of a zoning ordinance. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the City, finding that the ordinance at issue was rationally related to the achievement of legitimate state interests. We affirm.
I. FACTS
A detailed account of the events giving rise to this lawsuit may be found in our prior…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- John M. HAIRSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the GAINESVILLE SUN PUBLISHING CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Stanley Haves, Marjorie Haves, His Wife v. City of Miami, a Municipal Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Bannum, Inc. And Bannum Properties, Inc. v. City of Fort LauderdaleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- James S. Joel v. City of OrlandoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Rui One Corp. v. City of BerkeleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Community Housing Trust v. Department of Consumer & Regulatory AffairsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Board of County Commissioners v. CrowWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Ms. Serpentfoot v. Rome City CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.