Ms. Serpentfoot v. Rome City Commission
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
Ms. Serpentfoot, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil rights complaint, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against various local officials and individuals. The district court concluded that Ms. Serpentfoot’s complaint failed to state a claim for which relief could be granted. After reviewing the record and the parties’ briefs, we AFFIRM.
I. BACKGROUND
In July 2008, Serpentfoot filed a pro se complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia against: the Rome City Commission (“the Commission”) • and its commissioners; David…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Tannenbaum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Bryant v. Avado Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Wilchombe v. TeeVee Toons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Monumental Task Committee, Inc. v. FoxxDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2016
- Thomas v. Alcon LaboratoriesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
- Novak v. Safeco InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
- Petworth Holdings, LLC v. BowserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Hoefling v. City of MiamiDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.