Legal Opinion

Cash Processing Services v. AMBIENT ENTERTAINMENT

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided February 23, 2006No. 3:04 CV 0490 ECR EAMPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EDWARD C. REED, JR., District Judge.

Plaintiff Cash Processing Services (hereinafter “Plaintiff’ or “CPS”) initiated this action on September 10, 2004, by filing a complaint (#2) against Defendant Ambient Entertainment, Inc. (hereinafter “Defendant” or “Ambient”), alleging infringement of the “Mustang Ranch” trademark. Ambient filed a motion for summary judgment (#23) on May 26, 2005, claiming that the Government had abandoned the mark and seeking judgment in its favor and dismissal of the complaint (# 2). Plaintiff opposed (# 28) the motion (# 23) on June 20, 2005, and noted that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Saratoga Vichy Spring Co., Inc. v. Orin Lehman, Commissioner of Parks and Recreation of the the State of New York and Waters of Saratoga Springs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. Northwest Motorcycle Ass'n v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Bagdadi v. NazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. FreecycleSunnyvale v. Freecycle NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Specht v. Google Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  3. Marketquest Grp., Inc. v. BIC Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
  4. United States v. Mongol NationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
  5. Navajo Nation v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API